Hill Republicans move full speed ahead with push to slash Obama-era rules
By Mike DeBonis
January 17 at 12:03 PM - The Washington Post
When Vice President-elect Mike Pence addressed House Republicans in a
closed-door meeting earlier this month, he let them know just how quickly his
running mate plans to get to work.
The Jan. 20 parade from the Capitol to the White House would be sped up,
Pence said, so a newly inaugurated President Donald J. Trump could sit down
sooner in the Oval Office and start rescinding his predecessorfs executive
actions. The lawmakers cheered, two people in the room said.
When it comes to unraveling President Obamafs legacy, Trump could not have
found a more enthusiastic partner than the GOP Congress.
After just two weeks of work, the House has already passed several sweeping
bills that, if enacted, would roll back scores of Obama administration
regulations and make it significantly harder for future presidents — including
Trump — to write similar rules. One measure would allow Congress to eliminate a
host of regulations in one fell swoop, while another would make it harder for
agencies to issue rules to begin with.
Next month, the House is expected to take up more targeted measures that
would use fast-track procedures to undo several recent rules issued by
executive-branch agencies.
The effort to eliminate existing regulations and place curbs on future ones
has garnered almost unheard-of unanimity among fractious House Republicans and
heralds sweeping changes to federal labor, environmental and financial oversight
as the GOP takes control of Washington.
Not a single House GOP member opposed a trio of major regulatory
reform bills that have already passed this year; two other recent House bills to restrict financial-industry regulation were opposed by
only one Republican — Rep. Walter B. Jones of North Carolina.
gIt brings everybody together,h said Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), chairman of
the conservative House Freedom Caucus, whose members have often bucked party
leaders on major votes.
Among the regulations on the Republican chopping block are new Interior
Department rules aimed at protecting waterways near coal mines and preventing the release of methane, a potent greenhouse gas,
from oil and gas wells, as well as a Labor Department rule that expands overtime eligibility.
Democrats, along with major labor, consumer and environmental groups, are
warning of significant and lasting harm to the public from the GOP push. A list
of targets from the hard-line House Freedom Caucus includes school-lunch
nutrition guidelines, renewable fuel standards and anti-tobacco programs.
The effort could be slowed by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.),
who has expressed general enthusiasm for regulatory reform measures — but who
has yet to commit scarce Senate floor time, with health care and tax reform
looming.
House Republicans, however, are pushing full speed ahead. The Freedom Caucus
has drawn up its own list of more than 200 executive orders or regulations, most
but not all issued by Obama, that it is eager to see Congress or Trump undo.
Republican lawmakers are being encouraged by conservative activist groups —
including the Club for Growth, Heritage Action for America and the Koch network
— all of which are pressing lawmakers to make good on years of small-government
promises while the GOP controls both houses of Congress and the White House.
While conservative activists might have their differences with Trump on
matters such as infrastructure spending and entitlement reform, stifling
regulations is one area where they appear to be wholly simpatico.
gRegulations have grown into a massive, job-killing industry, and the
regulation industry is one business I will put an end to,h Trump said in a September policy address.
House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) said this month that regulatory rollbacks
gwill be one of the highest priorities of this new unified Republican
government.h
gFor too long, unelected bureaucrats have been simply telling people how
things are going to be,h he said. gThis needs to change, and not just by peeling
away this rule or that particular regulation.h
The Koch-affiliated Freedom Partners recently issued a gRoadmap to Repealh laying out dozens of Obama-era executive
actions and agency regulations it says constitute an gunprecedented onslaught of
regulatory costs on the U.S. economy.h The group has assembled a list of dozens
of Obama initiatives it wants to see reversed — some can be ended with a stroke
of Trumpfs pen, others are still in the rulemaking process and can be withdrawn,
while still others can be targeted through Congress or the courts.
The well-funded group is poised to reward or punish lawmakers, promising to
geducate votersh on whether particular lawmakers follow through.
gIf we do not take on regulatory reform now and keep those promises wefve
been talking about for years, then this would be a signature failure for us,h
said Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.), an author of the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny, or REINS,
Act, which passed the House on Jan. 5.
That bill would require Congress to approve any agency regulation that would
have an economic effect of more than $100 million, would lead to a gmajor
increase in costs or pricesh for consumers, industries, government agencies or
geographic regions, or would have gsignificant adverse effectsh on employment,
investment, productivity or innovation.
Another House-passed bill, the Midnight Rules Relief Act, would allow Congress to undo dozens
of recent Obama administration regulations in one combined action, while a
third, the Regulatory Accountability Act, would place major new burdens on
agencies seeking to issue regulations — requirements that Democrats say would
ggrind the rulemaking system to a halt.h
gWhat you do when you repeal regulations or make it harder to have
regulations is you make it better for business, better for the Chamber crowd,
better for the manufacturing folk,h Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.) said Wednesday on
the House floor. gThe side that loses is that of the consumers and the folks who
will be injured or killed because of lack of regulations.h
Each of the anti-regulatory bills passed the House in some form in previous
Congresses, but Obamafs veto pen and the threat of a Senate filibuster kept the
legislation from advancing. Now opponents are worried that Republicans will
succeed in landing at least some of the bills on Trumpfs desk.
Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen and chairman of a coalition
opposing the bills, said the GOP legislation would gwipe out our ability to
establish and enforce public protections, with catastrophic consequences.h
gThat House Republicans are choosing to make this package of bills one of
their first orders of business shows that they believe their constituents are
corporations and the super rich, not the American people,h he said.
Collins pointed to the recent uptick in the stock market — the Standard &
Poorfs 500-stock index is up roughly 6 percent since Election Day — as proof of
enthusiasm about the GOPfs anti-regulatory agenda.
gThe mood in country is saying, wefre no longer going to have to be worrying
about regulations and rules coming out from folks that we donft even know,h he
said. gThese businesses are not going to be spending hundreds, thousands or
millions of dollars on regulations but will be actually able to invest that in
equipment and people and things.h
The House will soon move to undo several recent regulations using the 1996
Congressional Review Act, which includes fast-track procedures to skirt Senate
filibusters. Targets could include the stream-protection and overtime measures,
as well as regulations on aircraft greenhouse-gas emissions, appliance
efficiency standards, and nondiscrimination compliance rules for federal
contractors. If those efforts are successful, future presidents could be
prevented from reregulating in those areas.
The more sweeping measures passed by the House are likely to be opposed by
most Senate Democrats, most of whom have little appetite for an anti-regulatory
agenda. But Republicans believe they have a winning issue that will force action
in the Senate, especially if Trump presses the matter.
Democratic senators in 10 states that Trump won last year — including such
increasingly conservative states as Montana, Missouri, Indiana, North Dakota and
West Virginia — will be up for reelection in 2018.
gThe question becomes, are they going to stand up for this big-government
regulatory agenda?h said Andy Koenig, Freedom Partnersf vice president for
policy. gItfs going to be very interesting to see how some of the Democrats
vote.h